Farmed
Animal Watch
A Project of Animal Place
June 27, 2002
(To Search This Page Press Ctrl F)
Issue #74
CONTENTS
2. UEP Lobbies Congress; Brainstorms on Spent Hen Uses
3. Deliberating Cages And Beak Cutting in the U.K.
4. Beef Checkoff Ruled Unconstitutional; Others Challenged
5. USDA Exempts Carbonated Milk For Sale in Schools
6. Animals to Determine Farm Design
7. Cattle Characteristics
8. Farmed Animal Care Resources
Compassion Over Killing (COK), a D.C.-based animal rights organization, has
released details of its latest investigation of a Maryland egg operation. In
April and May, COK activists covertly visited County Fair Farms in
Westminster, Md. Dead and dying hens were found in cages holding an average of
8 birds. Ten sick and injured hens were removed for rehabilitation and
sanctuary. Details of the investigation, along with photos, footage and
documents, can be viewed at: http://www.cok.net/campaigns/investigations/cff/
Last year, COK investigated ISE, another Md. egg operation. Efforts to get the
state to charge ISE with anti-cruelty violations were unsuccessful (see issue
#11). Investigations in Ohio and Minnesota have revealed similarly inhumane
conditions (see issue #36).
http://www.cok.net
2. UEP LOBBIES CONGRESS; BRAINSTORMS ON SPENT HEN USES
The United Egg Producers lobbied federal legislators during its Spring
Legislative Meeting in May, requesting congressional action on several
matters.
SPENT HENS: Congress was asked to immediately announce an additional $10
million "bonus" to purchase spent hen meat; to fund $15
million of research over 3 years to find new uses for the hens, and to
participate in a task force to identify and develop such uses.
NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM: Congress was requested to ask the USDA to withdraw
the outdoor access provision for poultry in the National Organic Program. UEP
maintains that outdoor access can subject the birds to disease.
The organization also made other requests regarding the funding and structure
of research.
http://www.poultryandeggnews.com/poultrytimes/news/June2002/87525.html
3. DELIBERATING CAGES AND BEAK CUTTING IN THE U.K.
An EU Directive bans conventional battery cages in member states as of 2012. A
public "consultation" was begun in the U.K. this week to determine
if enriched cages should also be disallowed there in favor of cageless
systems, as has been decided in Germany (see issue #60). Enriched cages have
more space per hen, and a nest, perch and litter. A British egg industry
council spokesperson said the industry does not believe enriched cages will
improve bird welfare but that consumers' purchases do not reflect survey
responses. In the U.K., about 70% of eggs are laid in cages though some
supermarkets already refuse to stock them.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/hi/english/uk/newsid_2065000/2065343.stm
It contains a link to an article entitled "The chicken rescuer,"
about a man who puts former battery hens "out to pasture" at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1216000/1216870.stm
http://www.just-food.com/news_detail.asp?art=50163&app=1
"Government floats plans to ban battery farming," Guardian
Unlimited, June 25, 2002.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/animalrights/story/0,11917,743681.00.html
4. BEEF CHECKOFF RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL; OTHERS CHALLENGED
The National beef checkoff program has been ruled unconstitutional and in
violation of ranchers' First Amendment rights. Checkoff collections will be
halted as of July 15th. Checkoff programs charge producers fees based on the
crops or animals they sell, with the money used to pay for marketing or
research to benefit the industry. (Fees from the beef program amount to about
$86 million a year.) Many small producers feel the fees primarily help large
packers and processors, and resent paying for promotions that they don't
consider to be in their interest. The lawsuit was brought by the Livestock
Marketing Association, the Western Organization of Resource Councils and
several ranchers against the USDA, the Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research
Board and Nebraska Cattlemen Inc. The Department of Justice represented the
USDA and argued that checkoff-funded speech is government speech, and
therefore not subject to the First Amendment. The USDA is now conferring with
the Justice Department. An appeal is expected.
http://www.agweb.com/news_show_news_article.asp?file=AgNewsArticle_20026231956_2211&articleid=88936&newscat=PWAS
"Pork Checkoff Case," National Hog Farmer, Joe Vansickle, June 15,
2002.
http://nationalhogfarmer.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazinearticleid=150487&magazineid=17&mode=print
"Dairy Today: Checkup For The Checkoff," Dairy Today Magazine, Paula
Mohr, June 2002.
http://www.agweb.com/news_show_news_article.asp?articleID=88958&newscat=GN
5. USDA EXEMPTS CARBONATED MILK FOR SALE IN SCHOOLS
e-Moo, a dairy-based carbonated beverage, has received approval from the USDA
as the first flavored, sweetened, carbonated products allowed to be sold in
school cafeterias since 1991. e-Moo was developed with the assistance of
Cornell University, Dairy Management Inc., and Mac Farms. A Mac Farms
spokesperson had this to say about the USDA's exemption: "Now we can get
e-Moo directly in front of the kids, which means providing them with a healthy
beverage they actually think is cool. This is an important step towards
expanding the acceptance of dairy beverages by youngsters who have tended in
recent years to drink less nutritious beverages more often." Carbonation
extends the product's shelf-life for up to 8 weeks. Soft drink giant Coca-Cola
Co. is planning to test 2 new flavored dairy drinks in the U.S. this fall when
millions of adolescents return to school.
http://just-food.com/news_detail.asp?art=50109&app=1
"Coke to test new dairy drinks – Observer," Reuters, Paul Simao,
June 24, 2002.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020624/bs_nm/food_coke_dc_1&printer=1
6. ANIMALS TO DETERMINE FARM DESIGN
A 1,000 acre farm in England is providing more natural settings for farmed
animals to see what conditions they prefer. Animal behaviorist and welfarist
Professor Marian Dawkins is leading a team of Oxford University researchers in
the long-term Food Animal Initiative study. Initial projects include
simulating forest floors in pens to allow pigs to root, providing natural
cover for cows to ease calving, and tracking sheep by satellite to study their
feeding habits. Ten acres will recreate wilderness for 3,500 chickens to
experience an environment more like the type known by their jungle ancestors.
Sows will farrow in private groups of 3 or 4 without disruption from
strangers. Privacy and a relaxed environment will eliminate tail docking since
pigs bite each others' tails out of stress. The team will be working with
British farmers for commercial applicability of the research, which is
supported by the RSPCA and funded by McDonald's and Tesco (the U.K.'s leading
grocery chain). The Initiative will also be used to increase awareness and
understanding of farming technique among schoolchildren.
http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/po/020620.shtml
"Five-star comfort gives animals a better life, and a better taste,"
Times Online, Valerie Elliot, June 25, 2002.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-2-337292,00.html
Food Animal Initiative
http://www.faifarms.co.uk/
7. CATTLE CHARACTERISTICS
An article entitled "Think Like A Heifer," explains how caretakers
can better work with calves by understanding how they view the world. The
article urges gentle handling and includes a number of interesting facts about
bovines. Bovines are herd animals and don't like to be separated from their
herdmates. Calves can readily tell the difference between 2 situations, and
will attempt to avoid the more stressful one. A calf's previous experiences
will affect their reaction to future handling. Fearful memories may persist
for months and increase the distance the calf attempts to keep between itself
and a person.
"A Closer Look at Beef Cattle," The Humane Society of the United
States, 2002.
http://www.hsus.org/ace/12773
8. FARMED ANIMAL CARE RESOURCES
The newly revised Swine Care Handbook is a 40-page, checkoff-funded resource
covering pig husbandry and practices, environmental management, housing,
feeding, and herd-health management. The introduction and preface particularly
emphasize pig welfare, as does the book's "Pork Producer Code of
Practice." The preface, written by Paul Thompson of Purdue University,
notes: "Emerging trends in marketing and contracting constrain producers'
flexibility and introduce powerful new actors into decision-making roles that
affect animal health and well-being.....If producers undertake a new effort to
provide assurance that animal interests are being taken into account in
contemporary husbandry, they can be sure that people from outside will be
watching carefully, even skeptically. What is more, such an undertaking will
almost certainly meet opposition from people whose view of animal protection
leaves no room for animal agriculture. At present, the broader public is
caught between these extremes on the one hand, and on the other a farm
community polarized by extreme views and reluctant to take any coordinated
action at all." The Handbook can be accessed at (Note: pdf file): http://www.porkscience.org/documents/Other/swinecarehandbook.pdf
