Farmed
Animal Watch
May 25, 2001
(To Search This Page Press Ctrl F)
Issue #9
CONTENTS
1. National Cattle
Survey Finds Lameness, Lesions & Lead Shot
2. UEP Warns Animal Welfare Concerns Will Not Go Away
3. Automated Live Bird Hanging System
4. British Jewish Board Considers Pre-Slaughter Stunning
5. Piglet Castration Study
6. New Zealand SPCA Toughens Stance on Animal Cruelty
7. Animal Protection Societies Join Others Entering Meat
Market
8. American Humane Association Looking to Help Keep Pork
Exports Flowing
9. Industry Commentator Lauds Alternative Production
10. Industrial-Strength Organics
11. America’s Best Pork Program
12. Global Meat Appetite Soaring, Feedlot Production Growing
13. Drug Use Risks and Benefits
14. Ways to Reduce Calf Stress
15. Beef Industry Promotes Veal Burger
1. NATIONAL CATTLE SURVEY FINDS LAMENESS, LESIONS & LEAD SHOT
Industry concerns identified by the 1999 National Market Cow and Bull Beef
Quality Audit include: bruising, antibiotic residues, arthritic joints, the body
condition (e.g., emaciation and “downers”) of marketed cows and bulls, and
the presence of lead shot in cattle. An estimated 10,000 animals (0.3%) were
contaminated with lead shot in 1999. [The study did not explain the source of
the lead shot.] Lameness of some degree was seen in 31.4% of the cattle,
and 0.8% of cattle were disabled or nonambulatory. Losses due to lameness
were greater than those found in a 1994 audit. Scratches and scarring of the
skin (“latent defects”) were identified on 60% of the cattle evaluated, and
20% of audited cattle had 2 or 3 branding marks.
“National Market Cow and Bull Beef Quality Audit–1999: A survey of
producer-related defects in market cows and bulls,” The Journal of Animal
Science, March 2001.
http://www.asas.org/jas/abs/2001/a0130658.htm
2. UEP WARNS ANIMAL WELFARE CONCERNS WILL NOT GO AWAY
Speaking at the March meeting of the American Egg Board, a spokesman for United
Egg Producers (UEP) made an “impassioned plea” for all involved in the egg
industry to immediately notify UEP of any legislation or other animal welfare
related activities. He emphasized that the “problem” will not go away and
much work is needed to address the problems created by animal activists. Another
speaker told of promotional efforts with women’s magazines, particularly with
food editors, with a total circulation of 241 million.
“Meeting Report: American Egg Board,” Egg Industry, April 2001.
http://www.wattnet.com
3. AUTOMATED LIVE BIRD HANGING SYSTEM
Georgia researchers are close to developing a viable commercial prototype of an
automated system that can shackle live birds to a slaughter line. It is
comprised of a grasping system that uses revolving rubber fingers to lift the
bird’s body while the conveyor drives the bird’s legs into an awaiting
shackle. Ultimately, the system is anticipated to save the industry money. A
lead researcher states, “The challenge....is gaining an understanding of what
it takes to handle a live, thinking, animate object.”
“Researchers Make Steps in Automated Live Bird Hanging,” Meat News, May 9,
2001.
http://www.meatnews.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Article&artNum=1092
4. BRITISH JEWISH BOARD CONSIDERS PRE-SLAUGHTER STUNNING
At the prompting of the RSPCA, the Board of Deputies of British Jews has agreed
to examine electronic stunning of animals killed in accordance with kosher
slaughter. Under Jewish tradition, an animal’s heart must still be beating
when the animal is knifed, but electrical stunning stops the heart. The matter
will be considered by the religious court and the Chief Rabbi. The RSPCA has
already met with some success with Muslim organizations, with the majority of
halal meat now being obtained from animals who were stunned at the time of
death. The last large scientific investigation into religious slaughter,
published in 1985 reported that, according to the most up-to-date scientific
evidence, “religious methods of slaughter, even when carried out under ideal
conditions, must result in a degree of pain, suffering and distress that does
not occur in the properly stunned animal.”
“Jewish Board to consider stunning of animals before ritual knife
slaughter,” The Electronic Telegraph, David Bamber, May 20, 2001.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=000140326706927&rtmo=wKos0Qob&atmo=wKos0Qob&pg=/et/01/5/20/nstun20.html
5. PIGLET AGE AND CASTRATION STUDY
Researchers measured the vocal and behavioral responses of piglets of different
ages (3, 10 and 17 days old) to castration. The piglets vocalized three times
more high frequency calls than did a control group on which mock
castration was performed, indicating the degree of actual pain associated with
the procedure (in contrast to distress). It was determined that piglet age does
not affect the degree of pain experienced from castration, though other factors
(e.g., distress) may be affected by it. [Editor’s note: This contradicts
previous claims that younger pigs are less sensitive to painful stimuli.]
“Behavioral responses of piglets to castration: the effect of piglet age,”
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73 (1): 35-43, July 2, 2001.
http://www.elsevier.co.jp/locate/issn/01681591
6. NEW ZEALAND SPCA TOUGHENS STANCE ON ANIMAL CRUELTY
The New Zealand SPCA has added confrontation to its strategy of consultation in
dealing with animal welfare issues, including hen cages and sow crates. The
organization adopted the new stance out of concern that industries might take
advantage of the fact that the SPCA would refrain from campaigning on an issue
while consulting with an industry on it. Commenting on sow stalls, the SPCA
president stated, “There’s a good chance of reaching agreement with the
industry on this issue, not least because pork producers know that,
internationally, the writing is on the wall for sow stalls. European countries
are getting rid of them and they’re already banned in the United Kingdom.”
He singled out the egg industry in urging other branches of industry to
responsibly negotiate.
“SPCA Gets Tough on Animal Cruelty,” Royal New Zealand SPCA press release,
The Newsroom,
May 21, 2001.
http://www.newsroom.co.nz/story/47257-37-0.html
7. ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETIES JOIN OTHERS ENTERING MEAT
MARKET
Britain’s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is negotiating a
nationwide deal to sell organic meat. The organization, which has criticized
intensive farming practices, is the latest of a number of prominent conservation
charities queuing to sell agricultural products. The RSPCA has a labeling scheme
for animal products entitled “Freedom Foods.” The National Trust,
Britain’s largest private landowner, is developing a labeling scheme for
“environmentally-conscious” beef, lamb and dairy products. (Its Scottish
sister organization markets “own branded” venison from 700 deer killed last
year on its 72,000 acre estate.) The Wildlife Trusts, a network of local groups
owning reserves across Britain, sells beef and pork and plans to market endorsed
milk from its tenant farmers. In response, the National Farmers Union has
launched a Red Tractor logo to label products meeting stricter animal welfare,
food safety and industrial safety standards. Critics from the green movement
argue that by moving into food production and hoping to befriend farmers, the
charities will inevitably weaken their ability to attack these farmers for using
unacceptable practices.
“RSPB to sell organic meat in high street,” The Organic Trade Services, May
24, 2001
http://www.organicts.com/newpros/general/index.shtml
8. AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION LOOKING TO HELP KEEP PORK EXPORTS
FLOWING
Les Viandes du Breton’s “all natural,” antibiotic-free pork is the first
pig product certified by the American Humane Association (AHA)’s “Free
Farmed” program. The Canadian company’s farms, facilities and practices meet
the AHA’s standards for being “humane.” The meat bearing the “Free
Farmed” logo will be marketed by Whole Foods Markets throughout the U.S.
Farm Animal Services (FAS) is a separate nonprofit organization created to
implement and monitor the AHA standards, which are based on guidelines developed
by the British RSPCA for its “Freedom Foods” animal product labeling scheme.
Six U.S. farms, producing beef, dairy, egg and poultry products, have also been
certified. For a $400/year inspection fee and $.50 per animal, FAS and AHA will
help advertise and direct market certified products. AHA/FAS spokeswoman Adele
Douglass explains, “The organization is looking to the future, recognizing
that the U.S. will need some type of standard to keep exports flowing.”
“Du Breton Natural Pork Earns Animal Welfare Certification,” National Hog
Farmer, Gretchen Vander Wal, May 15, 2001.
http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=17&releaseid=6323&magazinearticleid=102686&siteid=5
9. INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR LAUDS ALTERNATIVE PRODUCTION
Acknowledging that the pig industry has environmental and animal welfare image
problems, meat industry commentator Dan Murphy lauded an alternative production
system in his May 11th column. Mr. Murphy wrote: “I’ve been to
plenty of modern sow barns, and I have to be honest: It’s an unsettling sight
to see dozens of sows confined to concrete-and-rubber matted stalls barely big
enough to lay down lengthwise.” He went on to describe a Quebec company, Les
Viandes du Breton, the first company to carry the American Humane
Association’s “Free Farmed” certification seal. [See previous article.]
“Winds of Change in Pork Industry Bringing Sweet Smell of Success,” The
Meating Place, Dan Murphy, May 11, 2001.
http://www.meatingplace.com
10. INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH ORGANICS
An article in the May 13th New York Times Magazine contemplates the
industrialization of the organic food industry. For example, Horizon, a $127
million public corporation controls 70% of the retail organic milk market and
keeps thousands of cows on factory “farms,” eating organic grain and
tethered to milking machines thrice daily. With the organic market growing 20% a
year for more than a decade, the writer concludes that agribusiness has decided
the best way to deal with this alternative is to own it.
“Behind the Organic-Industrial Complex,” The New York Times Magazine,
Michael Pollan, May 13, 2001.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/13/magazine/13ORGANIC.html
11. AMERICA’S BEST PORK PROGRAM
Farmland Industries, a pig producer cooperative, has a 15-point checklist for
members to follow to meet quality and food safety guidelines and qualify for the
cooperative’s “America’s Best Pork Program.” The checklist, known as a
Process Verification Program (PVP) received USDA approval last May. Some animal
welfare points are included, such as very general handling procedures. It is a
“systems-specific program,” with the main restriction being no outdoor
production. A number of operations, including some very large systems, with a
total of 240,000 sows are enrolled in the program.
“Process Verification Program Answers Independents’ Call,” National Hog
Farmer, May 15, 2001.
http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=17&releaseid=6323&magazinearticleid=102681&siteid=5
12. DRUG USE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Antibiotic feed additives increase the probability of a drug-resistant disease
outbreak and increase treatment costs since more expensive drugs are needed to
treat such a disease, according to a recent USDA report. Farmed animal
production practices are the cause of at least 10% of the problems of
drug-resistant organisms in humans. A partial or full ban on industry’s use of
antibiotics could drive up costs for producers, especially those with
animals in concentrated feeding operations where diseases can rapidly spread and
disease outbreaks might take a heavy toll.
“USDA Report Discounts Adverse Effects of Antimicrobial Feed Additives,” The
Meating Place, Tom Cosgrove, May 22, 2001.
http://www.mtgplace.com/meatingplace/DailyNews/News.asp?ID=7480
13. GLOBAL MEAT APPETITE SOARING, FEEDLOT PRODUCTION
GROWING
The global appetite for meat has soared since 1961, with the number of mammalian
farmed animals up 60% and poultry having quadrupled to 15.7 billion. Feedlot
production, the fastest growing method of raising farmed animals, has become a
major threat to air, soil and water quality. In the U.S., livestock produce 130
times more manure than do humans, and feedlot production has been adopted by
“developing” countries. The demand for meat has also boosted the feeding of
antibiotics to farmed animals, further threatening the effectiveness of these
drugs, some of which are also used in human medicine.
“All-You-Can-Eat Economy is Making the World Sick,” Vital Signs 2001,
WorldWatch Institute, May 24, 2001.
http://www.worldwatch.org/alerts/010524.html
14. WAYS TO REDUCE CALF STRESS
Calmly handling calves, keeping them on pasture, and putting the cow and calf in
adjoining pastures at wean time, are among the ways offered by University of
Missouri researchers to reduce calf stress. Moving calves to a dry (dirt)
lot subjects calves to stress since they are more likely to get wet and muddy.
“Early weaning, faster finishing,” Beef Magazine, May 1, 2001.
http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=13&releaseid=6311&magazinearticleid=102356&SiteID=5
15. BEEF INDUSTRY PROMOTES VEAL BURGER
Champps Americana, a 40-unit U.S. restaurant chain, added a veal burger to its
permanent menu in April. Originally test marketed, it became the chain’s best
seller within 9 months. In August, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association
and state beef councils will be running promotions to increase the sale of veal
burgers, introduce a new “casual” form of veal, and introduce veal to those
who have never tried it.
“Veal Burger Promotion,” Meat News, May 21, 2001.
http://www.meatnews.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Article&artNum=1146
“Beef Industry Promotes Popular Veal Burgers,” AgWeb News, Darcy Maulsby,
May 16, 2001.
http://www.agweb.com/news_show_news_article.asp?file=AgNewsArticle_2001516157_329&newscat=GN
| Home | Newsletter Archives | Fact Sheets | Action Alerts | Meetings & Conferences | Important Contacts | Publications | Links | Search | Feedback |